I've had no luck arguing that this warning is a false positive with Uwe
Ligges. How long does this usually take?
What is more, while the issue has been resolved in the Boost code, it seems
to my untrained eye that winbuidler is indeed setting "-pedantic", which
it's not supposed to do. Is that not
On 17 December 2018 at 13:30, Nicholas Rittler wrote:
| I've had no luck arguing that this warning is a false positive with Uwe
| Ligges. How long does this usually take?
Nobody knows. If in doubt, try to make the issue go away.
| What is more, while the issue has been resolved in the Boost co
Hi, Dirk,
The warning is
"d:/RCompile/CRANpkg/lib/3.6/BH/include/boost/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:145:9:
warning: ISO C++ prohibits anonymous structs [-Wpedantic]"
It is a Windows-only warning and has been fixed in Boost 1.69.
Best wishes,
KK
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:53 AM Dirk Eddel
Hi KK,
Thanks for the speedy reply.
On 17 December 2018 at 12:00, Qiang Kou wrote:
| The warning is
|
|
"d:/RCompile/CRANpkg/lib/3.6/BH/include/boost/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:145:9:
| warning: ISO C++ prohibits anonymous structs [-Wpedantic]"
|
| It is a Windows-only warning and has
