[Rcpp-devel] Rcpp-devel vs Rcpp-commits mailing list

2019-04-04 Thread Chengyang . Ji12
Hi, Just asking if I'm in the right place. I saw several 'Rcpp' related mailing lists here https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/ listinfo but not sure which one to subscribe to. I use Rcpp a lot and want to find a place to ask for help on the usage but am not contributing to Rcpp a

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp-devel vs Rcpp-commits mailing list

2019-04-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 4 April 2019 at 07:15, Chengyang.Ji12 wrote: | Just asking if I'm in the right place. I saw several 'Rcpp' related | mailing lists here https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/ | listinfo but not sure which one to subscribe to. | | I use Rcpp a lot and want to find a place to ask

[Rcpp-devel] R/C++ post on R Devel Blog

2019-04-04 Thread Fernando H Toledo
Dear All, Recently Tomas Kalibera has post on the blog of R developers about the use o C++ in R packages. The post can be seem at the following link: https://developer.r-project.org/Blog/public/2019/03/28/use-of-c---in-packages/ I would like to know your thoughts over that. In summary, he r

Re: [Rcpp-devel] R/C++ post on R Devel Blog

2019-04-04 Thread Simon Urbanek
Fernando, there was a pretty big follow-up discussion on R-devel that's worth reading: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2019-March/077560.html but I want to point out that people may have misunderstood the recommendation - if you just use Rcpp (or other means) to get data from R, run some

Re: [Rcpp-devel] R/C++ post on R Devel Blog

2019-04-04 Thread Kevin Ushey
I think Tomas's post is clear and quite helpful, I just disagree with the conclusions. IMHO C++ (through Rcpp) is still the best way to interface with R from compiled code for the majority of users. Tomas's comments were mainly around the fact that things can go wrong if you start mixing R longjmp