On 16 July 2017 at 15:09, Ismail SEZEN wrote:
| I had a package that I wrote myself with Rcpp code. After Rcpp 0.12.12
update, I can not build and install the package and I’m getting the error below:
|
| ** testing if installed package can be loaded
| Error: package or namespace load failed for
>
> Not exactly "minimally reproducible". Do tell beforehand than cloning the
> repo will suck down 300+ megabytes. And that you have build requirements for
> other packages exotic enough that they are NOT met by the reverse depends of
> the now almost 1100 packages I test against. Not nice.
One of your other problems is that you mix twenty-eight generated function
interfaces (via the Rcpp::exports() tag, the recommended approach) with the
very old-school approach of two remaining manual .Call() in your R/hef.R.
That conflicts with us now using underscores, as the symbol name still
Hello all,
I had a package that I wrote myself with Rcpp code. After Rcpp 0.12.12 update,
I can not build and install the package and I’m getting the error below:
** testing if installed package can be loaded
Error: package or namespace load failed for ‘rpbl’ in dyn.load(file, DLLpath =
On 16 July 2017 at 15:39, Ismail SEZEN wrote:
| For the people who might have the same/similar issue;
|
| Please do not use direct call (as below) to cpp functions in your code
somewhere;
|
| .Call('rpbl_hef_list', PACKAGE = ‘rpbl’, ...)
You can. But then you must use the same form as
> On 16 Jul 2017, at 15:09, Ismail SEZEN wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I had a package that I wrote myself with Rcpp code. After Rcpp 0.12.12
> update, I can not build and install the package and I’m getting the error
> below:
>
> ** testing if installed package can be
Rcpp 0.12.12 arrived on CRAN this morning. The announcement is at
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2017/07/15#rcpp_0.12.12
and (without links) below.
Cheers, Dirk
Sat, 15 Jul 2017
Rcpp 0.12.12: Rounding some corners
The twelveth update in the 0.12.* series of Rcpp landed on
Lastly, and regarding the warning of being unable to parse your 'Infinity'
argument, we have had the following segment in Section 2.2 of the vignette
'Rcpp Attributes' for years:
Not all \proglang{C++} default argument values can be parsed into their
\proglang{R} equivalents, however the most