John Radencich wrote:
2.4.3.3 - Editor of serials
To be honest I've always hated this stuff. Editors change so often,
their roles vary from publication to publication, sometimes there are so
many editors for one publication you don't know who is doing what (even
when the publication says wh
Just one comment on Adam's response to my response to John's response, etc.
Renette
At 01:51 PM 1/10/2006, Adam Schiff wrote:
RD - I don't think the users have a clue that when we say "Began with:
Vol. 1, no. 6" it means we did not have the first piece in hand. However,
I'm pretty sure the
I have a few comments to add to this, knowing that it could be confusing
who's talking about what, since this is John's comments on Renette's
comments on John's comments.
Comments are below, preceded by jrr. (I didn't comment on everything.)
John
Renette Davis wrote:
I am adding some com
While I agree with John and others that editors are not usually important
for serials, there are many literary periodicals for which the editor is a
key piece of information. For example, Jean-Paul Sartre was editor of one
or two periodicals that I'm aware of -- in such cases, I would certainly
One more comment on John's comments on my comments on his comments.
At 01:04 PM 1/10/2006, John Radencich wrote:
2.6.1.3 - Recording numeric and/or alphabetic designations
John's original comment
Regarding what Renette Davis said about all these statements go
with the "began with
2.2.1 - Preferred source of information
I didn't find anything here that specifically mentions electronic
journals other than the assumption they would fall into 2.2.1.4 (other
resources). If they go here, then the only possible source mentioned is
"home page of an HTML web site." Accordin
John Radencich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>2.3.5.1 - Fefinition (for earlier/later title)
>"Vols. for 1996- have title: [etc.]."
If all you have is 1996, wouldn't that be 246 1 $iVariant title for
$f<1966>$a ... Vols for 1965 and/or 1967 may or may not have that
form. We do need those ang
I am adding some comments below with RD beside them.
Renette
At 02:17 PM 1/9/2006, John Radencich wrote:
2.2.1 - Preferred source of information
I didn't find anything here that specifically mentions electronic
journals other than the assumption they would fall into 2.2.1.4 (other
res
Like several others on this list, I stumbled over the use of the phrase
"not sequentially numbered in paragraphs ii) and iii) of 2.1.1.1.
Marg Stewart's email of 1/6/2006 (appended below) would appear to
confirm that this phrase is intended to cover the situation where the
numbered volumes of a
I have to agree with Steve, in that the rule specifically states
_"meaning of the title"_ as opposed to content, which is a totally
different thing. If you want you can try to have the wording of the
rules changed so that they specifically refer to content rather than
title, though I suspect som
10 matches
Mail list logo
