Issues in Applying RDA in Non-MARC Metadata Communities
Diane I. Hillmann
Jan. 31, 2006
Having come rather late to the RDA discussion, I recognize that the
points I bring up in this document may not be the comments that CC:DA
or JSC expects or desires at this stage, but I hope the concerns
Diane Hillmann has given us some excellent food for thought.
Kurt A. T. Bodling
Digital Resources Cataloger
State Library of Pennsylvania
333 Market St.
Harrisburg, PA 17126-1745
http://www.statelibrary.state.pa.us/
The State Library of Pennsylvania ... Serving and Preserving a
While I realize it is probably too late for the draft of Part I, it would be
helpful if future drafts of RDA rules could identify the AA2 rules (or parts of
rules) to which they correspond or from which they were derived. I (and
others) have spent a great deal of time trying to determine
Diane I. Hillmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oftentimes, the RDA (like traditional cataloging) herds catalogers to
make decisions about what is primary or secondary and relegates
the latter to the notes area.
It's refreshing to have someone step back from the trees and view the
forest as Ms
Excellent suggestion, Ed.
Or perhaps even just a list of the new rules that are supposed to represent
changes.
Deborah
---
Deborah Fritz
MARC Database Consultant
The MARC of Quality -- http://www.marcofquality.com/
Voice/Fax: (321) 676-1904
-Original Message-
From: Resource
5 matches
Mail list logo