It's difficult to respond to NLM/MLA's reaction to RDA, because I like
Hal agree with the basic premise, but disagree with even more of the
points which followed than he.
RDA should be delayed until there is consensus, and there is a high
probability of general acceptance. I also agree that not
Hello all,
I'd like to comment on one or two parts of the NLM document.
"As stated previously, NLM remains dismayed that, as presently
constituted, RDA represents a largely cosmetic revision, rather than
a high-level reexamination of content."
There has been a high-level reexamination of co
Alice, et al.:
I'd like to comment briefly on the contents of
your document, which I agree with in principle
and disagree with strongly in some specifics.
To quote the document:
"As stated previously, NLM remains dismayed that,
as presently constituted, RDA represents a
largely a cosme
3 matches
Mail list logo
