"entry"
?
A. Ralph Papakhian, Indiana University Music Library
Bloomington, IN 47405 812/855-2970 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
co-owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hal Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To refer to MARC21 for a moment (and revert to oldfashioned
>nomenclature), I would be reasonably happy to move into a mode where
>name headings (including work headings) were *always* categorized with
>the appropriate code in $4
But in a printed book catal
personality ... entity ... contributor ...
perpetrator ... I know -- how about "main entry"?!
dp
David M Pimentel : 734.657.3786
Doctoral Student : Information Science & Technology
School of Information Studies : Syracuse University
Gosh, I think lawyers use lots more terms than that. In my
experience, it's the computer scientists who use "entity."
Is there something wrong with "contributor?"
Diane
We could follow the practice of lawyers and use "entity"
Kelly Ann Green
KMS Content Analyst
Virginia Retirement Syst
The term chosen was "Party".
So, the main entry would be the "party of the first part" and the added
entries would be the "parties of the second part"?
Which leads to the "primary party" and "secondary party" or ...
"main party" and "added (or additional) parties".
But getting serious
We could follow the practice of lawyers and use "entity"
Kelly Ann Green
KMS Content Analyst
Virginia Retirement System
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cheryl Boettch
"Diane I. Hillmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gosh, I think lawyers use lots more terms than that. In my
>experience, it's the computer scientists who use "entity."
Wveryone was waiting to see what British Columbia would use on the
marriage license forms which would work for both heterosexu
"Perpetrator" works with "Family" in some contexts, too.
Kurt A. T. Bodling
Digital Resources Cataloger
State Library of Pennsylvania
333 Market St.
Harrisburg, PA 17126-1745
http://www.statelibrary.state.pa.us/
"The State Library of Pennsylvania ... Serving and Preserving a Written
Cultural He
At 03:38 AM 3/23/2006, Davey ,Mr Paul wrote:
In despair, before now, trying to find a single term for our opac that
would cover any of the below PLUS speakers, performers, composers,
artists, engravers, while having to deal with a character limit for the
opac label, I have thought of resorting t
hi,
is mac suggesting "criminal defendants" as the single term?
now that's radical!
--r
A. Ralph Papakhian, Indiana University Music Library
Bloomington, IN 47405 812/855-2970 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
co-owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget criminal def
I like it. It seems like these days we find more and more corporate
perpetrators, too. Will RDA address this issue, perhaps loosening the
restrictions of 21.1B2? (Or is this a particularly American
phenomenon?)
-Ben (tongue firmly in cheek) Haines
Dominican University GSLIS
On 3/23/06, Jay
But some people don't have any personality!
^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~
How about:
Someone Who Did Something
or
Person Who Did Something
of course that would eliminate non-human living entities. So, in order
not to be anthropomorphic, how about:
Being That Did Something
^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University
Martha Yee wrote:
It would be nice if RDA could find a better word than 'author' to
encompass actors, entertainers, musicians, sculptors, composers,
photographers, painters, etc., but perhaps there is no such word.
The imprecise term "creator" is used in some contexts. But I find it
hard t
Hal Cain wrote:
I wish we could find some acceptable collective term for the FRBR Group
Two entities Person, Corporate Body, and (to be added, as adumbrated in
the FRAR draft and elsewhere) Family. I've used "agent" on occasion,
meaning an entity that "does something" to create a work or expre
[I'm resending this with more adequate contact/affiliation
information in my signature--sorry for the duplication.]
Why not "personality"? Surely Geronimo Stilton and Koko the Gorilla
and Racter are recognizable to us as such. Persoenlichkeit ...
Works in German, too!
In despair, befo
Why not "personality"? Surely Geronimo Stilton and Koko the Gorilla
and Racter are recognizable to us as such. Persoenlichkeit ...
Works in German, too!
In despair, before now, trying to find a single term for our opac
that would cover any of the below PLUS speakers, performers,
compose
In despair, before now, trying to find a single term for our opac that would
cover any of the below PLUS speakers, performers, composers, artists,
engravers, while having to deal with a character limit for the opac label, I
have thought of resorting to "Person". But I didn't.
Cheers
Paul Da
Along those lines, and perhaps conforming to B. Eversberg's notion of
"involver", perhaps a slightly less loaded term (but admittedly not
entirely neutral!) would be: perpetrator. Abbreviated in relator codes
to: perp.
Jay Towne Smith
Senior Cataloger
San Francisco Public Library
[EMAIL PROTE
> In despair, before now, trying to find a single term for our opac that would
> cover any of the below PLUS speakers, performers, composers, artists,
> engravers, while having to deal with a character limit for the opac label, I
> have thought of resorting to "Person". But I didn't.
Don't fo
20 matches
Mail list logo
