Thanks for this Rennette.
>A joint CONSER/CRCC working group was put together to write a discussion >paper, and that paper is available at: > >http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/discussion-paper-limited.pdf While I agree with the general thrust of the paper, and the discussion, I miss consideration of serials which revert to an earlier title, or flip flopping (the vexing multiple records for _Atlantic_). It seems to me reversion to an earlier title should be a special case, with the earlier record reopened, with interim title(s) in 246$i$a. The present situation if highly confusing to patrons and staff alike. __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________