Thanks for this Rennette.

>A joint CONSER/CRCC working group was put together to write a discussion
>paper, and that paper is available at:
>
>http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/discussion-paper-limited.pdf


While I agree with the general thrust of the paper, and the discussion,
I miss consideration of serials which revert to an earlier title, or flip
flopping (the vexing multiple records for _Atlantic_).


It seems to me reversion to an earlier title should be a special
case, with the earlier record reopened, with interim title(s) in 246$i$a.


The present situation if highly confusing to patrons and staff alike.



   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to