Re: [RDA-L] RDA example records longer?

J. McRee Elrod wrote: The differences (and time savings) will I believe become more obvious when we get beyond our current flat database structure into the true relational database structure that RDA is really intended for. A manifestation record for a new edition of, say, Shakespeare's Hamlet

[RDA-L] ALA ALCTS Cataloging Norms Interest Group - Boston Midwinter Meeting

ALA ALCTS CCS Cataloging Norms Interest Group ALA Midwinter Program, Boston Saturday, January 16, 2010, 1:30-3:30 p.m. Hyatt Regency Hotel, Grand Ballroom “B” All are invited to attend the meeting of the Cataloging Norms Interest Group in Boston on Saturday, January 16 from 1:30 to 3:30, held

Re: [RDA-L] Items without a collective title

B.Eversberg wrote: Alternatives are a mixed blessing. They are meant to make more users happy but they burden them with the decision making. As goes without saying, agencies need to specify which alternatives to follow in what cases - or very quickly they'd find their databases messed up

Re: [RDA-L] Items without a collective title

Quoting Weinheimer Jim j.weinhei...@aur.edu: It is still beyond me why we are even considering changing any of these rules, e.g. in this case of how to deal with items without a collective title? I'm sure that everyone has heard explanations of how the term MARC actually is used for

[RDA-L] Unsubscribe

Please remove me from this list.

Re: [RDA-L] Sharing records (was: Items without a collective title)

In article 8cb2a72be4144b4cac0ef3e9a9f6d0655a42a...@aur2010.aur.edu, you wrote: If we concentrated on getting away from sharing our records using ISO2709/MARC21 to more modern methods, there could be some hope that our records may become relevant to the world outside libraries. I'm more