[RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

2011-07-28 Thread Karen Coyle
I decided that I wanted to play with creating RDA data in XML (not RDF-XML), so I did a very short experiment, which is located here: http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML.html This is NOT a test or any kind of proof because it's just one short cataloging record that I copied into RDA fields. In

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

2011-07-28 Thread Casey A Mullin
Hi Karen, Thanks for posting this to the list. As I understand it, there are two discrete RDA elements at play here: Language of the Expression (6.11), and Authorized Access Point Representing an Expression (6.27.3). As you point out, only the former is registered in the RDvocab.info

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

2011-07-28 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Karen Coyle said: rda:titleOfTheWork Hamlet. French /rda:titleOfTheWork AccessPointHamlet. French/AccessPoint or even AccessPointShakespeare...etc. Hamlet. French/AccessPoint In MARC, the language would be subfield coded, so I suspect at least as much granularity

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

2011-07-28 Thread Casey A Mullin
Mac, I think the the lack of added entries you are citing is only relevant in a left-anchored browsing environment. Moving forward, such left-anchored entries are not required for access. If a work is about Hamlet, contains Hamlet, derives from Hamlet, etc., then the term Hamlet will be

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

2011-07-28 Thread Gene Fieg
I want to be sure I understand this. If the work is a criticism of Hamlet, under current subject heading rules, there would be a 600 10 Shakespeare, William. |t Hamlet, right? On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: Karen Coyle said: rda:titleOfTheWork

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

2011-07-28 Thread James Weinheimer
On 28/07/2011 17:42, Karen Coyle wrote: snip Each of these parts of the access point could (and probably should) be coded separately in the record. The question is whether they should *also* be included as an access point. There are, however, no RDA or FRBR elements listed for access points.

[RDA-L] XML RDA record

2011-07-28 Thread J. McRee Elrod
From Karen Coyle's http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML.html LC control no.: 87211501 Type of material: Book (Print, Microform, Electronic, etc.) In RDA, this would be: text, unmediated, volume Personal name: Omescu, Ion. Uniform title: Hamlet. French This would be the uniform title

Re: [RDA-L] XML RDA record

2011-07-28 Thread Karen Coyle
So that we don't get side-tracked into discussion of improper cataloging, I think I should quickly find an example that is better. I'll do that and post it. kc Quoting J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca: From Karen Coyle's http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML.html LC control no.: 87211501

Re: [RDA-L] XML RDA record

2011-07-28 Thread Mark Ehlert
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: ISBN:              2130401309 Notes:             Includes index.                   Bibliography: p. [269]-270. It is not clear to me whether LCPS will opt for Includes bibliographic references (pages [269[-279) and index, as is now the case.

Re: [RDA-L] XML RDA record

2011-07-28 Thread Kevin M Randall
Mac Elrod wrote: RDA says nothing about display, but display (perhaps mistakenly) affects punctuation. It would be far simpler to have standardized punctuation for each element. The supplying of ISBD punctuation would be much better left to applications outputting ISBD displays. ISBD

Re: [RDA-L] XML RDA record

2011-07-28 Thread Brenndorfer, Thomas
-Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: July 28, 2011 1:40 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] XML RDA record ... Authorized

[RDA-L] Second RDA in XML example

2011-07-28 Thread Karen Coyle
http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML2.html I didn't do anything this time with the uniform title, although I did use the title portion for the Work title and the language portion for the language of expression. I haven't figured out what to do with the LCCN -- it's a related metadata record,

[RDA-L] XML RDA record (fwd)

2011-07-28 Thread J. McRee Elrod
LC control no.: 87211501 [snip] ISBN: 2130401309 Sorry, I should have remaked that in an international environment, if both LCCN and ISBN can not be displayed at the top, ISSN is more important. __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca) {__ | /

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

2011-07-28 Thread J. McRee Elrod
James said: In the best scenario, it seems this should be something like: AccessPoint work author personalNameShakespeare/personalName Shakespeare did not write the critique. His play is the subject. originalTitleHamlet/originalTitle this is not the original title of the critique, unless you

Re: [RDA-L] Second RDA in XML example

2011-07-28 Thread Mark Ehlert
Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote: http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML2.html I disagree with the term you select for Form of Work. It looks like you pulled it from the Content Type list, which under RDA is expression-level material. I'd probably use Play or something similar, preferably from a

Re: [RDA-L] Second RDA in XML example

2011-07-28 Thread Karen Coyle
Quoting Mark Ehlert ehler...@umn.edu: Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote: http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML2.html I disagree with the term you select for Form of Work. It looks like you pulled it from the Content Type list, which under RDA is expression-level material. I'd probably use Play