Re: [RDA-L] Some comments on the Final Report of the FRBR Working Group on Aggregates

2012-01-12 Thread Bernhard Eversberg
11.01.2012 21:14, Gene Fieg: Somewhere in this thread, there was statement FRBR and RDA, whose English was muddy, to say the least. One of the most important things that can be done to RDA is to rewrite it--in the understanding that a sentence should be subject, verb, object. As it stands now,

Re: [RDA-L] Some comments on the Final Report of the FRBR Working Group on Aggregates

2012-01-12 Thread James Weinheimer
On 12/01/2012 12:12, Bernhard Eversberg wrote: snip No matter, however, how excellent Ms Oliver's product will turn out, the major roadblock on RDA's way to success will remain its closedness as a subscription product. So, under the circumstances given, how big is the chance of RDA succeeding

[RDA-L] Major conference on libraries and the Semantic Web, 26-27 April 2012

2012-01-12 Thread Diane Hillmann
Please hold these dates! (And forgive any duplication in posts ...) *April 2012 marks the fifth anniversary of the Data Model Meeting [1] at the British Library, London attended by participants interested in the fit between RDA: resource description and access and the models used in other metadata

[RDA-L] Site for cataloging rules

2012-01-12 Thread Gene Fieg
For those looking for some info on current and to-be cataloging rules, try this link out: http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/cataloging-ru Aaron had sent a post but the url was broken, but there was enough in it for me to search on Google for Common cataloging rules and one of the

Re: [RDA-L] Site for cataloging rules

2012-01-12 Thread Gene Fieg
I meant to say I searched the phrase cooperative cataloging rules on Google. Not in quotes. On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu wrote: For those looking for some info on current and to-be cataloging rules, try this link out:

Re: [RDA-L] Some comments on the Final Report of the FRBR Working Group on Aggregates

2012-01-12 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Thomas, lots of stimulating thought in your latest post. I'll just comment on some bits. These are contributor relationship designators between persons (or corporate bodies or families) and expressions. But the report on aggregates follows up on the FRBR revision for expressions, where

Re: [RDA-L] Some comments on the Final Report of the FRBR Working Group on Aggregates

2012-01-12 Thread Brenndorfer, Thomas
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller [wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de] Sent: January-12-12 3:26 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L]