Mac said:
I failed the mention record exchange. To exchange records, the
records need to be complete in themselves. Just as UTLAS substituted
text for RSN in access points when exporting records, our ILS would
have to be capable of creating the complete textual record, not only
for display
On 05/06/2012 11:29, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:
snip
We do lots of record exchange in Germany between various systems. In
the exchange format, it's common to have both the heading in textual
form and the national authority control number, but I'm fairly sure it
would be no problem if only the
Thomas,
thank you for this very instructive mail.
It is correct that one Creator element and one Title proper element can
duplicate the Work Manifested element if the form used is the authorized access
point for the work (name + title form), as opposed to an identifier (such as a
URI).
On 05/06/2012 13:54, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:
snip
Come to think of it, this seems to be a general flaw in RDA: For
instance, if there is more than one statement of responsibility, we're
told to record the statements in the order indicated by the sequence,
layout, or typography of the
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Sent: June 5, 2012 7:55 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Work manifested in new RDA examples
...
In RDA though, just pointing to
On 6/5/12 4:54 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:
T
But I think this raises a very important point: RDA only has one
(repeatable) element creator. Indeed, one wonders why it's not
possible to express the notion of the most important creator somehow.
Wouldn't the obvious solution be a
On 6/4/12 12:43 PM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:
Maybe. But think of all the money and resources which has already been
gone into RDA. Makes you wonder why it shouldn't be possible to invest
some of it into an open source solution which would be available to
all...
But then, of course, this
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
Keeping an exact order is less intuitive in RDF. I'm not sure how that
would be done.
This would be good time to try and go over some of the ways that one can
represent this kind of ordered values using some different
Thomas said:
The Find user task needs to be satisfied. In card catalog conventions, the main entry
heading collocates related works. Using some sort of (standardized) method for the value
of the Work manifested means that other works can specify something that will
link back to the work in
9 matches
Mail list logo
