Re: [RDA-L] 260 and 264 field

2012-07-13 Thread Robert Maxwell
I agree that it would be good for manuscripts catalogers to include 264 -0 $a (place of production) and $b (producer's name) if the information is available, but remember that in RDA (just as in AACR2) only the date of production element is core in a production statement (see 2.7.6; 2.7.2 (place

Re: [RDA-L] 260 and 264 field

2012-07-13 Thread J. McRee Elrod
I asked: >> I wonder if any will use the 264 2nd indicator for producer in DVD >> records for the original producer of a motion picture. Adam answered: >I hope not, as this would be an incorrect use. RDA defines production as >having to do with unpublished resources ... It would be good fo

Re: [RDA-L] 260 and 264 field

2012-07-13 Thread Adam L. Schiff
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, J. McRee Elrod wrote: I wonder if any will use the 260 2nd indicator for producer in DVD records for the original producer of a motion picture. (Some include producer in 245/$c, others interpret RDA to mean producer goes in 508; test records are inconsistent. We use 508.)

Re: [RDA-L] 260 and 264 field

2012-07-13 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Joan Wang asked: >What is the differences between 260 and 264? Thomas will undoubtedly say my answer is wrong, but *only* in terms of how it affects the work here at SLC: Field 260 as used in AACR2 records need not have indicators (AACR2 did not adopt repeating imprint requiring indicators as d

Re: [RDA-L] 260 and 264 field

2012-07-13 Thread Joan Wang
Very helpful! Detailed and clear explanations. Now I totally understood. Thank you very much. Have a great weekend! Joan On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Deborah Fritz wrote: > ** > Joan, > > The 264 field was made valid in 2011 as one of the fields needed to > provide more granularity in reco

Re: [RDA-L] 260 and 264 field

2012-07-13 Thread Deborah Fritz
Joan, The 264 field was made valid in 2011 as one of the fields needed to provide more granularity in recording data when following RDA instructions, but it has only recently begun to show up in MARC records. The wording for input conventions for the 264: "Field 264 is useful for cases where t

[RDA-L] 260 and 264 field

2012-07-13 Thread Joan Wang
Hi, fellows Let you know first, I am still learning RDA. Anybody would like to be my teacher and explain the new field 264 field? I am a kind of confused with it. In RDA Toolkit, the filed 264 does not appear in the mapping of RDA elements with MARC field, but it is used in RDA MARC records exampl

Re: [RDA-L] RDA-L Digest - 10 Jul 2012 to 12 Jul 2012 (#2012-111)

2012-07-13 Thread Boyer, Ginny
How can I get removed from this listserv? Ginny -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of RDA-L automatic digest system Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:00 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.C