For *authority* records, LC are accepting any order for the moment.
We've been putting $e at the end, but any $d after that. There seems to
be a school of thought that $d should precede $c.
_
Richard Moore
Authority Control Team Manager
The British Library
Michael Cohen asked:
>Is there a prescribed order to the subfields in 040?
The instructions and form differ. We tend to be monkey see, monkey
do, and LAC (which due to bilingualism has used 040$b for years) has
alphabetic order.
The MARC21 binders show them in alphabetical order. I see no re
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Michael Cohen wrote:
> The RDA Workform for Books includes this field (where XXX = OCLC institution
> code):
> XXX ǂb ǂe rda ǂc XXX
> and MARC Field Help for 040 instructs:
> Enter subfield ‡e immediately after subfield ‡a.
> So which is wrong, the Workform or the
I think Buzz got it right. In my experience if one is creating an original
record OCLC puts it where it wants to (not sure if that means truly where it
belongs?) but when I am working on enhancing/updating copy I have been adding
it to the end of the string, and then when you finalize things OCL
Hmmm. I've been adding $e rda at the end of the string; then, if and when I
make additions and/or changes, the $d follows the $e.
Does this matter? I think OCLC will arrange things in the 040 any way it
likes.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Michael Cohen wrote:
> The RDA Workform for Books incl
The RDA Workform for Books includes this field (where XXX = OCLC
institution code):
XXX ǂb ǂe rda ǂc XXX
and MARC Field Help for 040 instructs:
Enter subfield ‡e immediately after subfield ‡a.
So which is wrong, the Workform or the Field Help?
--
_
For the 040, I have been trying to follow the order given in a new RDA
workform; that is, $b eng followed by $e rda
Don't know if it makes any difference or not what the order is.
Carolyn Kadri
Head Cataloger
Special Collections
University of Texas at Arlington
Arlington, TX 76016
ka...@uta.edu
Is there a prescribed order to the subfields in 040? I see some RDA
records with $e after $a [e.g. OCLC #316058624] and some with $e between
$b and $c [e.g. OCLC #699487827] and some with the subfields in alpha
order [e.g. OCLC #780483684].
???
--
Yes, find it. Thanks. *
"When constructing an authorized access point to represent a particular
expression of a work or of a part or parts of a work, add to the authorized
access point representing the work or a part or parts of the work an
element or elements identifying that expression*".
Joan
In FRBR, the title of expression is an attribute for the entity expression. But
I could not find it in the RDA Toolkit.
> Have you tried chapter 5, paragraph 5.5 in particular. It seems pretty
> straightforward.
Also, if a work can have an uniform title, a parallel uniform title, and
variant t
Hi,
I am trying to catch on. I just read Robert's interesting comments on using
130 and 240 According to the FRBR's explanation, the title of work seems
to refer to uniform titles, if my understanding is correct.
*The title of the work is the word, phrase, or group of characters naming
the work
J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Karen Coyle said:
>
>>It doesn't matter if these are coded as multiple 1xx's or multiple 7xx's
>>-- they are equal as authors ...
>
> How does one create an added entry, subject, entry, footnote, or
> listing in a single entry bibliography for the work? Not to mention
> as
12 matches
Mail list logo
