Laurence Creider said:
>I'm not fond of the latest issue for continuing resources, but at least
>there is a conceptual difference between a continuing resource in paper or
>electronic format and a serial.
Perhaps you mean integrating resouces? Serials and integrating
resources are both continuin
I've been thinking about the last couple of paragraphs of Mr. Danskin's
message off and on, and I just don't see how allowing for both earliest
and latest issue as the basis for description is going to result in
anything but chaos in catalogs and discovery of information. That would
be true for bo
Joan Wang said:
>But what is the solution for those that have not been cataloged? It
>is possible that the original manifestations have not been
>cataloged?
This is an old problem. With the LCRI on reproductions, one was in
the ridiculous position of creating a record for something not in hand
i
OK! I got it. Thanks to Steven.
Joan
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Arakawa, Steven wrote:
> If the OCLC BF&S considers the $w to be mandatory if a 775 is created,
> then I think your only recourse is a note, preferably formatted (in my
> opinion).
>
> ** **
>
> Steven Arakawa
>
> C
On the topic of linking in the earlier thread, what would be the relationship
for the Group 1 category for exhibition catalogs in these situations?
a. An exhibition catalog and a commercial publication of the catalog.
775 $i Related (manifestation): ??
b. A travelling exhibition wh
If the OCLC BF&S considers the $w to be mandatory if a 775 is created, then I
think your only recourse is a note, preferably formatted (in my opinion).
Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 065
Come out another question: if OCLC control numbers are not mandatory, how
can we can these fields as linking entry fields? :D
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Joan Wang wrote:
> Hi, Steven
>
> Thanks. I thought that OCLC control number is mandatory. If
Hi, Steven
Thanks. I thought that OCLC control number is mandatory. If it is not,
there would be no problem.
Thanks again,
Joan
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Arakawa, Steven wrote:
> I don’t think you can use 533 since it is intended to apply to the
> reproduction. I was wondering if 534
I don't think you can use 533 since it is intended to apply to the
reproduction. I was wondering if 534 $p should read Reproduction of
(manifestation): . The current LCPS uses 775 or 776, but both examples seem to assume
an existing catalog record for the original, but a linking control number
Hi,
I got an impression from the 2012 OLAC conference. For reproductions,
transcribe information based on the reproduction in your hands such as in
the three new 33x fields, and record data related to its original
manifestation in linking fields such as 776 and 787, and also use
relationship term
I agree. I read the announcement several times. It is very reasonable.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller <
wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de> wrote:
> This is great!
> Many thanks to JSC for paving the way for a more flexible
This is great!
Many thanks to JSC for paving the way for a more flexible
approach.
Heidrun
Alan Danskin wrote:
JSC
Announcement: First
I am out of the office until 11/16/2012.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "[RDA-L] First issue v. latest issue - JSC Announcement" sent on 11/14/2012 6:25:03 AM.
This is the only notification you will receive while this perso
JSC Announcement: First issue v. latest issue
Recent discussions on RDA-L have high-lighted that in RDA the
description of resources issued in more than one part is based on the
earliest issued or lowest numbered part.(2.1.2.3)
JSC acknowledges that this is not a FRBR requirement and c
14 matches
Mail list logo
