Joan,
In the Defiance example in 6.11.1.4 the recording of the language of
expression would, in a bibliographic record, be done only in 041. There
aren't three different expressions of the film in English, German,
Russian, there is only a single expression which has dialogue in 3
languages.
Thank you for your responses. We are of split opinion of the non-requirement of
justification. some feel the relationship designators are sufficient while
others still see the need for notes.
Our opinion is also split on how to deal with compilations. Do we go with
structured notes and make
Thanks, Adam
RDA 6.27.3 does refer to 6.11 for constructing authorized access point
representing an expression. But Library of Congress Policy limits an
addition of an expression attribute to four types of materials, which does
not include motion pictures.
Thanks again,
Joan Wang
On Thu, Jun
Actually, the LC-PCC PS limits the addition of an expression attribute to four
situations, not four types of materials. Translations are one of the categories
and are not limited to a specific content type or media type.
Daniel Paradis
Bibliothécaire
Direction du traitement documentaire
And not only justify entries, but also justify fixed fields. For instance,
in hand right now, the fixed field for Index has value of one, but there is
no note to that effect.
Justifying it gives information to the patron, in plain English.
What is our goal here? Down and dirty? Or cataloging
I agree. I feel like I have noticed a lack of 504 notes in RDA records
even though there clearly are bibliographical references present in a
book. It's not core in RDA (7.16), but LC considers it to be core in the
LC-PCC PS for the rule. For general bibliographical references this
information
6 matches
Mail list logo
