Re: [RDA-L] RDA 2.3.2.9 Resource lacking a collective title

>For example, labeling 100 as "Author" does not apply to a criminal >defendant in 100. Labeling 100 "Person" adds no useful information. >I've seem nothing better than an unlabeled ISBD display. All of those are corrected in RDA, where it is recognized that all the names in a 100 field are not

Re: [RDA-L] ] The "A" in RDA

I don't mean to be offensive; not to demean the hard work that has gone into (and the ongoing work) making RDA .. But, RDA is a nonsense! It's about cataloguing the sake of cataloguing! I has nothing to do with access, or the user! Looking at this forum, and a couple of others; the discussion by "c