I have always wondered why the 650/655 term was Large type books.
We have (or had):
245 |h [text (large print)
300 350 p. (large print) or 350 pages (large print)
655 Large type books
People know what large print means, so why the discrepency?
Dawn Grattino
Senior Cataloger
Catalog
Look at this:
150 Large type books
450 Large print books
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Dawn Grattino dawn.gratt...@cpl.org wrote:
I have always wondered why the 650/655 term was Large type books.
We have (or had):
245 |h [text (large print)
300 350 p. (large print) or 350
Hi!
Perhaps the solution is to give rare/older materials cataloguers the
possibility to record phrases such as « published by » as an optional addition
... Otherwise, the general instruction could simply ask cataloguers to record
the name of the publisher, distributer, etc. ...
That is exactly the option that is available to them. The PCC RDA BIBCO
standard record (BSR) metadata application profile
(http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/scs/documents/PCC-RDA-BSR.pdf) states to use the
Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Books for many of the transcribed fields. 4C2
says to include
I totally support that and especially like your remarks about the English
language bias.
Myriam.
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Leonard, William
Sent: August-08-13 2:38 PM
To:
But why is Large print books the see FROM in the AR when everyplace else in the
record it is the term used?
Dawn Grattino
Senior Cataloger
Catalog Department
Cleveland Public Library
17133 Lakeshore Blvd.
Cleveland, OH 44110-4006
(phone) 216.623.2885
(fax) 216.623.6980
e-mail:
It bothers me in our discussions concerning RDA usage, that most parse
the rules without reference to patron service.
No set of rules can every cover all eventualities. In the absence of
a rule, e.g., how to record '61 as a date of production, the most
important consideration it seems to me
I agree. And that is why we don't follow pcc rules altogether. For
instance, we will add the Translation of note, include pagination of
bibliographies if appropriate. We do think that entries should be
justified in the description. Why? Because we have to realize that
cataloging uses very
Or to the manifestations. As illustrated in this 19th-century engraving:
http://macabremuseum.com/collections-database/spirits-and-their-manifestations-an-evening-seance-engraving/
Liz O'Keefe
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu wrote:
I agree. And that is why we don't
That is why I like to do RDA workshops in October. All those entities and
manifestations, and the occasional medium.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Elizabeth O'Keefe eoke...@themorgan.orgwrote:
Or to the manifestations. As illustrated in this 19th-century engraving:
Haha, is there a nice illustration showing medium of performance for a spirit
expression?
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Stewart, Richard wrote:
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:12:10 -0500
From: Stewart, Richard rstew...@indiantrailslibrary.org
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description
LOL, good Friday humor, Liz.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Elizabeth O'Keefe wrote:
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 18:01:39 -0400
From: Elizabeth O'Keefe eoke...@themorgan.org
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
To:
12 matches
Mail list logo
