[RDA-L] RDA rule equivalence AACR rule 21.23C1

by either main entry or via some means of cuttering. Don Charuk Cataloguer/DBM Trainer Cataloguing Dept. Toronto Public Library Email : dcha...@torontopubliclibrary.ca Phone : 416 393-7760

[RDA-L] Content notes

seems to address notes code in the 520 tag. Thank you Don Charuk Cataloguer Toronto Public Library

Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors

We are trying to come to grips with this issue as staff adjust to some of the peculiarities of RDA. I would agree that a creator of an illustrated book sans text should be regarded as the creator and given the designator artist. Yet, if you read LC-PCC PS for rule 18.5.1.3 it suggests that

Re: [RDA-L] SOR from copyright statement

This raises another question. If the author is provided on the title page and the illustrator is provide on the title page verso can they both be transcribe in the statement of the responsibility? Does not the rule 2.4.2.2 state the SOR should come from the same source as the title proper. If

Re: [RDA-L] SOR from copyright statement

I thank you all for the clarification. We were unsure on the interpretation of the rules regarding order and rigidity of the preferred sources.

[RDA-L] Syntax for relationship designators

Could someone please explain the rational of either including or not including the comma before the relationship designator. We have found names with either no dates or with closed dates using the comma. While names with open dates are not using the comma. Our Web team dislikes the

Re: [RDA-L] Justification of Acces Points

Gene Please do not get me started on fixed fields. (most are a waste of time in my opinion, and a classic MARC example of information redundancy) And as to what our public wants/needes in information is an exercise of how many angels dance on the head of a pin. Don Charuk Cataloguer/DBM

Re: [RDA-L] Justification of Acces Points

Thank you for your responses. We are of split opinion of the non-requirement of justification. some feel the relationship designators are sufficient while others still see the need for notes. Our opinion is also split on how to deal with compilations. Do we go with structured notes and make

[RDA-L] Justification of Acces Points

From my readings and the reading other's comments it has been said that RDA no longer requires you to justify your additional access points. Is this a valid interpretation of people's comments? If, so is there a specific rule that states this or is it implied? Thank you.