Re: [RDA-L] 6.2.2.10 and 6.27.1.9

2013-12-17 Thread Wilson, Pete
adding an additional qualifier to distinguish them. Now we are doing it for all works. The second example probably should not have subfield $s preceding the parenthetical qualifier. Adam Schiff On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Wilson, Pete wrote: Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:44:25 + From: Wilson, Pete

Re: [RDA-L] 6.2.2.10 and 6.27.1.9

2013-12-16 Thread Wilson, Pete
Adam--Can you give any examples of NACO authority records that have qualifiers like your Best of X's poetry? I have been unable to turn any up and am curious. Thanks. Pete Wilson Vanderbilt University -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and

[RDA-L] Relationship designator for corporate creator

2013-11-29 Thread Wilson, Pete
Here's what I hope is a quick question. Say you're cataloging an exhibition catalog that is legitimately entered under corporate body--e.g., a museum. The museum put on the exhibit, published the catalog and owns all the art involved. What is the appropriate relationship designator for the

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for corporate creator

2013-11-29 Thread Wilson, Pete
Thanks, Mac. Sorry, I obviously meant 110, not 100. And I was not thinking of single-artist exhibitions. Multiple-artist exhibitions often are entered under corporate body, in the circumstances I mentioned.) The designation issuing body is not listed in RDA as associated with the creator

Re: [RDA-L] Added access point for one name in a work that is a compilation of works

2013-11-24 Thread Wilson, Pete
Mac: That is helpful. I did not ask about whether the statement of responsibility representing the contributors of component works should be recorded in the 245 $c, but I can see the argument against that. But I am still left wondering whether a plain 700 author added entry is allowable

Re: [RDA-L] Added access point for one name in a work that is a compilation of works

2013-11-24 Thread Wilson, Pete
: http://www.mail-archive.com/rda-l@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca/msg08543.html Heidrun On 23.11.2013 02:36, Wilson, Pete wrote: I’ve just joined this list and I did it so that I can ask this question. Please take a look at OCLC record #840606230, if you would. This book is conference proceedings

[RDA-L] Added access point for one name in a work that is a compilation of works

2013-11-22 Thread Wilson, Pete
I've just joined this list and I did it so that I can ask this question. Please take a look at OCLC record #840606230, if you would. This book is conference proceedings, and has two statements of responsibility, one for a compiler (i.e. editor of compilation) and one for 20 authors, which has