The placement of punctuation inside vs. outside quotation marks is a US/UK
English convention. US = inside (generally); UK = Outside (generally).
This probably affects the difference between ISBD, with its more international
focus, and the LCRI, which would follow predominant US style.
Cheers,
Adam,
I think there is value in doing so, since YA readers who enjoyed the book aimed
at them might want to read the more complex version; conversely, readers who
find the “adult” version too unpleasant might still enjoy reading a novel that
dealt with its topic and themes. A common author
Gene,
This proves what, exactly? If we are to align our cataloging rules to the
display capability of online systems, we will have an even more dizzying area
of localized standards. I, for one, do not want to see the ExLibris Aleph v20
Policy Decisions published, followed by the III Milennium
This is a lack of historical knowledge on the part of JSC as to the nature of
the Authorized Version, then. As originally published, it had all the books of
the present Catholic canon. I don't think it is a necessary evil to ignore
Biblical textual history.
Naomi Young
University of Florida
I cannot speak authoritatively, but the exceptions you list are for units of
measure. I believe that is the general principle here being applied. Since
pressing is not a unit of measure, I doubt it will be abbreviated. But I'll
be interested to see whether my reasoning is correct.
Naomi Young
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:52 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA and granularity
I have always been bemused by the jargon we
6 matches
Mail list logo