: Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record
Rich McRae asked:
When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
mani= festations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that
two bibliogr= aphic records should be created? ...
That is my understanding
Greetings-
When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two
bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and that, with
the proper coding (00x, 33x, etc.) and description, hybrid
Rick McRae wrote:
When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two
bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and that,
with the proper coding (00x, 33x, etc.) and description,
manifestations on one bibliographic record
Rick McRae wrote:
When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two
bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and
that, with the proper coding (00x
Rich McRae asked:
When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate mani=
festations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two bibliogr=
aphic records should be created? ...
That is my understanding, just as it was mandated by AACR2. So far,
so far as I know,
5 matches
Mail list logo