[RDA-L] 300 $b for still images in volume format

Hi again! I don't think I would write up a content note in 520 since in 336 the content type is clearly defined as still image. Now, for « normal » still images (i.e. pictures on a sheet of paper or other 2D carrier), we never include terms like « ill. » or « images » since it would be

Re: [RDA-L] 300 $b for still images in volume format

Marie-Chantal (what a pretty name) said: we never include terms like « ill. » or « images » since it would be redundant to say an image is illustrated! You are assuming that 336 displays. If it displays, I've not so far seen it in brief display. The 300 collation should be understandable on

Re: [RDA-L] 300 $b for still images in volume format

Just to be a carmudgeon about this. Those 3XX fields are very structured and may not immediately understandable to the patron. So I would include illustration in the 360, since this written in much more straightforward English. On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM, L'Écuyer-Coelho Marie-Chantal