Re: [RDA-L] 667 field in Name Authority Record

2012-08-07 Thread Mary Mastraccio
Gene Fieg asked: will all of the companies that do authority work, will they give us a free review of our entire files once authority records are rdaed? The answer of course is It depends. I cannot speak for other companies but I suspect it is similar. Any library that has a Notification

Re: [RDA-L] 667 field in Name Authority Record

2012-08-07 Thread Martha Rice Sanders
...@etal.uri.edu 401-874-4951 From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 6:51 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 667 field in Name Authority Record Until

[RDA-L] 667 field in Name Authority Record

2012-08-06 Thread Steven York
Hi, OCLC, ARN 76188 has an odd 667 message and I'm not sure what it means: THIS 1XX FIELD CANNOT BE USED UNDER RDA UNTIL THIS RECORD HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND/OR UPDATED It's a DLC record. So it's OK if it's NOT being used under RDA? Any thoughts? -- Steve York Cataloging Librarian Paul and

Re: [RDA-L] 667 field in Name Authority Record

2012-08-06 Thread Jerri Swinehart
I plan on using these with AACR2 until RDA comes in... Thank you. Jerri Swinehart MLIS Metadata Technician Oakland University Kresge Library Technical Services Rochester, MI 48309-4484 swine...@oakland.edu

Re: [RDA-L] 667 field in Name Authority Record

2012-08-06 Thread Tillett, Barbara
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] 667 field in Name Authority Record Hi, OCLC, ARN 76188 has an odd 667 message and I'm not sure what it means: THIS 1XX FIELD CANNOT BE USED UNDER RDA UNTIL THIS RECORD HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND/OR UPDATED It's a DLC record. So it's OK if it's NOT being