On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
Perhaps MARBI could arbitrarily make this change without reference to
AACR2 or RDA, as they made 260 repeating, a concept foreign to AACR2.
Someone has to formally make a proposal to MARBI to get any MARC changes
made. MARBI doesn't just take up sug
Robert said:
>Not to defend RDA's treatment of this,
which would be hard to do :-{)}
>but "or" between titles on a title page is certainly different from
>"and" or "with" between titles on a title page.
All three are conjunctions in the midst of a longer transcribed title
of the item in hand.
Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:00 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Alternate titles
In terms of subfield coding, we treat alternate titles the same way as
the later title(
There's a big difference in my mind. In one case (a resource with an
alternative title) we're talking about a single work. In the other case,
we're talking about two different works with no collective title. You
can't have an "or" in the latter case, it would make no sense.
Adam
^
In terms of subfield coding, we treat alternate titles the same way as
the later title(s) of an item without a collective title.
RDA has backtracked on that. AACR2 1.1G says in part concerning
punctuation of titles of an item without a collective title: "even if
the titles are linked by a connect
5 matches
Mail list logo
