Re: [RDA-L] Change to option in 2.4.1.5 (Statement of responsibility naming more than one person, etc.)

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:45 PM, M. E. wrote: > This is a continuation of AACR2's "rule of three," at least as far as the > number of names to post go. > Mea culpa. "...at least as far as the number of names that should appear before invoking." -- Mark K. Ehlert Minitex

Re: [RDA-L] Change to option in 2.4.1.5 (Statement of responsibility naming more than one person, etc.)

J. McRee Elrod wrote: > SLC will give at least three from each category. Giving only the > first would be less access than AACR2 in some cases. > Read it again. "If a single statement of responsibility names MORE THAN THREE persons, families, or corporate bodies performing the same function (o

Re: [RDA-L] Change to option in 2.4.1.5 (Statement of responsibility naming more than one person, etc.)

Jeidrun posted: >The option used to read "omit *all* but the first of each group of such >persons, families, or bodies", and now it says "omit *any* but the first >of each group of such persons, families, or bodies". SLC will give at least three from each category. Giving only the first would

[RDA-L] Change to option in 2.4.1.5 (Statement of responsibility naming more than one person, etc.)

Has everybody noticed the change to the option in 2.4.1.5 (Statement of responsibility naming more than one person, etc.) in the July update? It went over the fast track, so it's not marked in the Toolkit and also doesn't appear in the update history. The option used to read "omit *all* but th