Beth asked:
Can a MARC record which does not contain =E2=80=9Call the core
elements that are applicable and readily ascertainable=E2=80=9D
(0.6.1) but in all other ways follows RDA guidelines be coded as an
RDA record (008/18 i and 040 $e rda).
Yes, it should be coded i (ISBD punctuationn is
Beth,
I cannot help with the MARC coding, but I can try and explain 0.6.1:
My colleagues and I are confused by the two subpoints (a and b)
outlined in 0.6.1 which refer to choosing to apply various levels of
description and/or detail. Do those options only apply when including
“other
Some of our staff create minimal level records which may not contain all
the applicable core elements, but the elements in the record conform to RDA
guidelines.
Can a MARC record which does not contain “all the core elements that are
applicable and readily ascertainable” (0.6.1) but in all other
3 matches
Mail list logo
