Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

ofquality.com Voice/Fax: (321) 676-1904 > -Original Message- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description > and Access [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of > John Attig > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 8:07 AM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

John Attig wrote: On the other hand, as noted above, the JSC will continue to post proposals, whether this is done on the JSC website or as part of the RDA Toolkit itself. We are committed to making the maintenance of RDA a public process. Good news. Will the RDA text (the XML structured

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

At 05:07 PM 5/3/2010, Deborah Fritz wrote: I asked one of the ALA Publishing reps, at one of the RDA meetings at ALA Midwinter, about tracking official changes to RDA, and was told that this was on the list of enhancements, and would be addressed once the initial product was released. Of equal c

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

The Joint Steering Committee recommended that the complete examples not be included as a formal Appendix to the text of RDA. Instead, complete examples will be mounted as a document on the JSC website. The intention is that this document will be made available this summer, to coincide with th

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

--Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Bothmann, Robert L Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:24 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites I'm a little concerned that t

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

/ Resource Description and Access [ > rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] on behalf of Troy Linker [tlin...@ala.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:17 PM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites > > Hi Mark, > > Thank you for your question. Yes th

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites The constituency review draft is still available at http://www.rdatoolkit.org/constituencyreview -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Beha

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites This is a concern of mine, also, and I too would like to understand the publishers' plans for archiving all iterations of RDA and making them accessible. Robert L. Maxwell Special Collections and Ancient Languages Ca

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

> -Original Message- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description > and Access [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of > Robert Maxwell > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 4:51 PM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA we

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

bject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites I'm a little concerned that the constituency review has been removed from rdaonline.org and that there is no re-direct from the previous URL. Scholarly works and presentations have cited this as a source and it is an important part of the history of catalogi

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites Hi Mark, Thank you for your question. Yes the www.rdatoolkit.org is the new primary website for RDA. The www.rdaonline.org URL is in the process of being redirected to www.rdatoolkit.org. It can take up to 48 hours for this redirecti

Re: [RDA-L] RDA websites

Hi Mark, Thank you for your question. Yes the www.rdatoolkit.org is the new primary website for RDA. The www.rdaonline.org URL is in the process of being redirected to www.rdatoolkit.org. It can take up to 48 hours for this redirection to propagate through the internet. After this time lin

[RDA-L] RDA websites

The most recent message from Troy Linker refers to the website , which is new to me. The site I've visited previously, , is still active, but hasn't been updated with the new pricing information (yet). Is rdatoolkit.org the primary RD