Mark said:
,,,describe WEMI as levels of information about the thing being
cataloged: for the book in hand, the work is the idea conveyed by the
uniform (preferred) title or name-title heading; the expression
describes in broad and narrow strokes the content, the language, the
mode of
Just as a knowledge of yee olde unit card helps one understand AACR2,
a knowledge of AACR2 helps one understand RDA. How library school
students coming to RDA without background will understand it, I've no
idea.
For example, you know how I feel about dividing non cast credits
between 245$c and
I agree, i found 2.4 incomprehensible when applied to moving images.
What i could piece together of the rules did not agree with the
examples. My suspicion is that the intent is to separate the creators
from the contributors and somehow end up with a statement of
responsibility exactly like
Greta de Groat wrote in part:
I did report this in the comment period since it clearly met the
criteria for inconsistency. I have no idea whether it has been
addressed in the tweaks that have been done since the comment period
closed. I will be anxiously awaiting the release to see if this
4 matches
Mail list logo
