From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod [m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: October-05-13 11:36 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Uniqueness of titles
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adger Williams
Sent: October-08-13 10:01 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Uniqueness of titles proper
Thomas said
snip
No, there is no equation
Steven Arakawa said:
Both will have 245 00 $a John Rawls. One difference between RDA and
AACR2/LCRI was that monograph title main entry conflicts in the same
way that serial title main entry conflicts, so one of the collections
will need a 130 John Rawls with a qualifier.
How much simpler to
Mac said:
steven Arakawa posted:
I understand that work titles can conflict and we would need to break
the conflict in such cases ...
Only if neither has an author main entry (or author as part of AAP as
Kevin would say). Of course two different works should not have the
same preferred
-BAC.GC.CA] on behalf of Heidrun Wiesenmüller
[wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de]
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 06:49
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Uniqueness of titles proper
Mac said:
steven Arakawa posted:
I understand that work titles can conflict and we would need
-L] Uniqueness of titles proper
Mac said:
steven Arakawa posted:
I understand that work titles can conflict and we would need to break
the conflict in such cases ...
Only if neither has an author main entry (or author as part of AAP as
Kevin would say). Of course two different works should
Steven quoted RDA:
If the preferred title for a work is the same as or similar to a
title for a different work ... differentiate them ...
To resort of pre FRBR/RDA language we all understand, I think this
mist be understood as saying:
If the preferred title [main entry] for a work is the same
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Uniqueness of titles proper
Steven quoted RDA:
If the preferred title for a work is the same as or similar to a
title for a different work ... differentiate them ...
To resort of pre FRBR/RDA language we all understand, I think this
mist be understood as saying
Thomas said:
RDA 5.3 says to record additional elements to differentiate identical
?titles of works.
In real life, I suspect most will add data to make titles unique only
for title main entries, and for author/title subject and added entries
for works in the *very* rare case of two works by the
From: J. McRee Elrod [m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: October-05-13 6:40 PM
To: Brenndorfer, Thomas
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Uniqueness of titles proper
RDA 5.3 says to record additional elements to differentiate identical
?titles
steven Arakawa posted:
I understand that work titles can conflict and we would need to break
the conflict in such cases ...
Only if neither has an author main entry (or author as part of AAP as
Kevin would say). Of course two different works should not have the
same preferred title if they are
11 matches
Mail list logo
