Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-05 Thread Benjamin A Abrahamse
Libraries 617-253-7137 From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 2:43 PM To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points And meanwhile

Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-05 Thread Kelleher, Martin
and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Benjamin A Abrahamse Sent: 05 July 2013 14:32 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points I agree that the heading -approximately 250 borders on incoherence. died circa 250 is much less ambiguous. Do

Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-05 Thread Benjamin A Abrahamse
and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Benjamin A Abrahamse Sent: 05 July 2013 14:32 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CAmailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points I agree that the heading -approximately 250 borders on incoherence. died

Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-05 Thread John Hostage
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] on behalf of Elizabeth O'Keefe [eoke...@themorgan.org] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 12:07 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points In the best of all possible worlds, lack of certainty about a piece of information such as a birth or death

Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-04 Thread Lasater, Mary Charles
and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:58 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points Autocatters RDA-lers, It was my assumption that we would have

Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-04 Thread Elizabeth O'Keefe
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points Autocatters RDA-lers, It was my assumption that we would have to follow LC/LAC authority forms. But we are encountering opposition to approximately replacing ca., and I agree. It makes an unsightly access point. I'm suggesting we

Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-04 Thread James Weinheimer
On 04/07/2013 18:07, Elizabeth O'Keefe wrote: snip On a somewhat related issue (it was raised in Mac's post), is anyone else bothered by the display when only a death date is known? Smith, John, -1932 /snip I have experienced the same thing. I recently cataloged an item with the subject

Re: [RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-04 Thread Gene Fieg
And meanwhile the patron is wandering in the desert supplicating the deity for meaning. On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:25 AM, James Weinheimer weinheimer.ji...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/07/2013 18:07, Elizabeth O'Keefe wrote: snip On a somewhat related issue (it was raised in Mac's post), is

[RDA-L] approzimately in access points

2013-07-03 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Autocatters RDA-lers, It was my assumption that we would have to follow LC/LAC authority forms. But we are encountering opposition to approximately replacing ca., and I agree. It makes an unsightly access point. I'm suggesting we weplace ca. and approximately with a question mark following