AW: [RDA-L] Follow-up to Karin Patzer's post on latest/successive entry for serials

2006-03-20 Thread Patzer, Karin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Renette Davis Gesendet: Freitag, 17. März 2006 17:21 An: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA Betreff: [RDA-L] Follow-up to Karin Patzer's post on latest/successive entry

Follow-up to Karin Patzer's post on latest/successive entry for serials

2006-03-17 Thread Renette Davis
I found this message very interesting and apologize for waiting so long to respond to it. I did not know that this was the practice in Germany and really appreciate the information. I have a question for Karin (or anybody else from Germany). Since the rules for cataloging monographic series are

Re: latest/successive entry for serials

2006-02-16 Thread Hal Cain
J. McRee Elrod wrote: Patzer, Karin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally our proposal: Use latest entry for minor changes and successive entry for major changes. This accords exactly with the demands of our special library customers, so it's what we do regardless of what AACR2 currently says.

Re: latest/successive entry for serials

2006-02-15 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Patzer, Karin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally our proposal: Use latest entry for minor changes and successive entry for major changes. This accords exactly with the demands of our special library customers, so it's what we do regardless of what AACR2 currently says. Libraries want the record