-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Renette Davis
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. März 2006 17:21
An: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Betreff: [RDA-L] Follow-up to Karin Patzer's post on latest/successive entry
I found this message very interesting and apologize for waiting so long to
respond to it. I did not know that this was the practice in Germany and
really appreciate the information. I have a question for Karin (or anybody
else from Germany). Since the rules for cataloging monographic series are
J. McRee Elrod wrote:
Patzer, Karin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally our proposal: Use latest entry for minor changes and
successive entry for major changes.
This accords exactly with the demands of our special library
customers, so it's what we do regardless of what AACR2 currently says.
Patzer, Karin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally our proposal: Use latest entry for minor changes and
successive entry for major changes.
This accords exactly with the demands of our special library
customers, so it's what we do regardless of what AACR2 currently says.
Libraries want the record
4 matches
Mail list logo