Re: [RDA-L] Plans for Existing Bib Records?

2011-05-19 Thread Benjamin A Abrahamse
Mac, et al., I certainly agree that the changes will be more dramatic, and to be honest, in some cases not welcome (to my mind, at least). What also has changed since AACR2 came along is the number of staff members we have supporting the cataloging, and the willingness of our administration

Re: [RDA-L] Plans for Existing Bib Records?

2011-05-19 Thread Myers, John F.
J. McRee Elrod wrote: There were no main entry changes for monographs as dramatic as the dropping of the rule of three. For me, the most difficult earlier change was entry for serials and series. I had spent years with Journal of chemistry being entered under title, and Journal of the Chemical

Re: [RDA-L] Plans for Existing Bib Records?

2011-05-19 Thread Jennifer Sweda
Agreed [though I'm not sure that's the specific issue Mac was addressing] -- the Task Force on the Rule of 3 final report (2001) reads: The rule of three was certainly not based on the functions of the catalog as stated in the basic principles cited above [the Paris Principles, etc.]; when

Re: [RDA-L] Changes between rules (was: Plans for Existing Bib Records)

2011-05-19 Thread J. McRee Elrod
John Myers listed earlier rule changes: The changes incumbent with respect to: 1. - form of entry for pseudonyms, 2. - form of entry of corporate bodies, 3. - editors as main entry, and 4. - corporate bodies as main entry were substantial. 1. Yes, moving Clemens to Twain was a major

Re: [RDA-L] Changes between rules (was: Plans for Existing Bib Records)

2011-05-19 Thread Ed Jones
On my planet, the change in corporate body entry was quite noticeable. It took place in a predominant context of card catalogs, prior to large-scale retrospective conversion, and required users to look under two headings--typically widely separated in the catalog--for many, many corporate

Re: [RDA-L] Plans for Existing Bib Records?

2011-05-19 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Jennifer Sweda quoted the Paris Principles: ... when access is deliberately left out of the record for a given author, then the catalog will not be an efficient instrument to find out which works by a particular author ... RDA requires only the first author and illustrators of children's

Re: [RDA-L] Plans for Existing Bib Records?

2011-05-19 Thread James Weinheimer
On 05/19/2011 07:22 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote: snip Jennifer Sweda quoted the Paris Principles: ... when access is deliberately left out of the record for a given author, then the catalog will not be an efficient instrument to find out which works by a particular author ... RDA requires only