RDA-L readers,
A correspondent has sent the following privately:
See RDA 3.1.4 and the associated LCPS for several options. If you choose to
describe the accompanying
material, LCPS says you can either use a $e in the 300 of the primary
content, or use a second 300 altogether. You can also
Joan, I think you're assuming that an authority record will be created
for every new name cataloged under RDA. In practice, I doubt this will
happen..
Yes. You are right. The assumption seems to hardly happen :)
If data can be transcribed as elements in categories, such as Author, Name:
And can fields 344-347 (with an explanatory $3) also be used for
accompanying material?
John Williams
Robert H. Evans Library
Johns Hopkins University SAIS Bologna Center
http://www.sais-jhu.edu
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
I think in 336-338 fields with $3. Do not know 344-347.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:05 AM, John Williams jwilli...@johnshopkins.itwrote:
And can fields 344-347 (with an explanatory $3) also be used for
accompanying material?
** **
John
I I have the same problem. I tried to find relevant rules for accompanying
materials when I tried to prepare a comprehensive list of examples of 300
fields. The only thing I found in RDA Toolkit is Related Manifestations. I
found it through the mapping of MARC fields to RDA under Tools. The
term
Ian Fairclough ifairclough43...@yahoo.com wrote:
I found this as a pagination statement:
[xvii], 219 pages
The source has no initial sequence with roman numerals. I have not found
instructions for use of brackets with supplied page numbering. Nor does
the bibliographic record refer
JOHN C ATTIG jx...@psu.edu wrote:
I proposed this issue as a project to CC:DA, and there is a Task Force
working to draft appropriate instructions for recording both contents notes
and accompanying materials statements (and perhaps other things); a
preliminary report of this Task Force (which
Ian Fairclough ifairclough43...@yahoo.com wrote:
Granted that a Playaway can be judged as unmediated. But nevertheless,
something that arose earlier in this discussion caught my attention: the
suggested use of other with media type audio. Surely other is only
established as controlled
I'm not understanding what the difficulty is. Maybe it's how someone looks at
a part of a resource? If the resource is primarily a book, and has a CD or DVD
in a pocket, is that disc accompanying material or is it just a part of the
resource? I myself wouldn't consider it an accompanying
Joan Wang jw...@illinoisheartland.org wrote:
If data can be transcribed as elements in categories, such as Author,
Name: Date: Affiliation: , and then authority records could be
automatically created. Is that right? Just my imagination :)
Could be. So far in MARC, the 38x fields
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:49:26 -0500, M. E. m.k.e.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian Fairclough ifairclough43...@yahoo.com wrote:
I found this as a pagination statement:
[xvii], 219 pages
The source has no initial sequence with roman numerals. I have not found
instructions for use of brackets with
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:56 AM, M. E. m.k.e.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I for one welcome the strawman proposal instruction 27.1.1.3.2.3 on page
23. As RDA stands now, book-ish accompanying material isn't handled well.
I should clarify that last sentence: if following one of the ISBD options
and
RDA-L readers,
Thanks to Mark Ehlert for the correction to my earlier post. Here are the
instructions he refers to. Curiously, 3.2.1.3 has a table, but 3.3.1.3 does
not. 6.9.1.3 has a
table and also a link from the sentence to the head of the table.
3.2.1.3 RecordingMedia Type:
If none of
Apparently it is not easy to make paragraphs and sentences consistent. I am
kidding.
Have fun :)
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Ian Fairclough ifairclough43...@yahoo.com
wrote:
RDA-L readers,
Thanks to Mark Ehlert for the correction to my
Ian Fairclough ifairclough43...@yahoo.com wrote:
Kevin Randall said I'm not understanding what the difficulty is. The
difficulty was a couple of missing links in RDA Toolkit. I was not
succeeding in getting to the right part of RDA (and in this case, LC PCC
PS), namely 3.1.4. The redirects
Hello RDA-L,
I am unsure how to handle dates of publication for technical reports.
Generally, technical reports bear a date in the format Month Year (e.g.
December 2012) on the cover and/or technical report documentation page.
(Many reports do not have a title page.) On the report, this bit of
Arthur Liu art@gmail.com wrote:
I am unsure how to handle dates of publication for technical reports.
Generally, technical reports bear a date in the format Month Year (e.g.
December 2012) on the cover and/or technical report documentation page.
(Many reports do not have a title page.)
All I am saying is under AACR2. If a date (Month Year) is a part of title,
I will transcribe it in the title. I feel that it is sometimes important to
differentiate a technical report by a specific date. I usually put only the
year in 260 but with brackets, since I infer the publication year from
Mark said:
So far in MARC, the 38x fields populate both bib and authority
records; the 37x's only the authority. There's the issue too with
how the authority's 6xx's map over to the bib side.
Yes, we find what should be in an authority record, and what should be
in the bibliographic record.
Ian posted:
[xvii], 219 pages
Isn't bracket-comma double punctuation? Are we to start putting a
comma after city when supplying bracketed jurisdiction in 264$a?
Does the comma before $erelator term replace a period at the end of an
entry (unless an abbreviation) as does the comma before $d?
RDA-L readers,
Just a follow-up to Mac Elrod's post. I sent the original message in a state
of being almost sure that I was looking at an erroneous situation. After
reading the responses, I became completely sure.
Thanks to all of you who've responded to my several posts over the last 24
21 matches
Mail list logo
