Greta
Wouldn't a relationship designator in an X11 field go in $j? X11 $e is
for subordinate unit.
Regards
Richard
_
Richard Moore
Authority Control Team Manager
The British Library
Tel.: +44 (0)1
The complexity and contiguity of the universe in general does not conform very
well to static, controlled lists. This includes not only relationships but also
names of things and people, abstractions and topics, and pretty much everything
catalogers see fit to record and use as a 'controlled voc
Nancy Braman said:
>> The complexity of the bibliographic world does not fit neatly into a
>> finite predetermined set of terms.
>
>True; and it seems to be getting more complex all the time.
Appropriate $4codes or $eterms are lacking for some non complex
situations, e.g., 111 conference heading
Hi,
-This is a general question-
I would like to know on which subfield/s is you date index based on. I think it
should be based on 008/07-10 ; 11-14 and not on 260$c and 264$c but our ILS
provider says that it is not possible. Here is the explanation. It is
mentioned that most sites (librari
That depends on whether 'The director's event' is to be considered a
compilation of works by different persons, etc. (6.27.1.4) or a collaborative
work (6.27.1.3). I think it's the latter, so the first-named of those creators
would be used in the AAP.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
> Sent: May-06-13 1:12 AM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?
On 06/05/2013 15:27, Nancy Braman wrote:
> Quoting "J. McRee Elrod" :
>
>> The complexity of the bibliographic world does not fit neatly into a
>> finite predetermined set of terms.
>
> True; and it seems to be getting more complex all the time.
Yes. There is another aspect to this as I discover
Quoting "J. McRee Elrod" :
Then there are "spirit" writings and compositions; another version of
"as told to"?
Oh, dear. Now I'll be waiting to see $echanneller. (Kidding, honest!)
The complexity of the bibliographic world does not fit neatly into a
finite predetermined set of terms.
Tru
Good morning,
I'm hoping for some guidance on how to handle
edition information that's included in an access
point. Specifically, although RDA contains plenty
on edition statements, it never addresses whether
an edition in an access point is included with or
without parentheses. For example
Thanks to everyone who advised about 34X use, and apologies for delayed
thanks - I was waiting to see if there were any different strategy
suggestions. We'll assess how much 34X work could be covered by
templates and fixes and how much it would add to work on individual
records before deciding wha
J. McRee (Mac) Elrod wrote:
" By definition isn't any person, body, or family in 1XX a creator?"
As I understand it, there is no logical link in RDA between entities
considered as creators (i.e., entities which can take relators from the
creator list in Appendix I) and entities which can be the na
11 matches
Mail list logo