On 9/12/2013 11:06 PM, Patricia Sayre-McCoy wrote:
snip
Please explain why this is necessary to transcribe? At some point, every author
will be dead so what's the point of making note of it now? I really don't see
that this is vital information for the identification of the
337 Media Type aligns most frequently with the GMD:
projected [for moving images] = motion picture
Obviously it is not possible to walk from 337 to GMD. This is the way
we do it in preparing AACR2 compatible records from RDA records:
If 338 is: Export as 245$h:
Toot on. If you don't who will. It has already been passed on to the
discussion list of our OPAL group of libraries that's a sub-group of
OhioLink, and I thank you for encouraging that. Although I don't fully
share your overall positive endorsement of RDA, that's probably water
over the dam. I
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jack Wu
Sent: September-13-13 12:05 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] YouTube video, Resource Description Access (RDA)
Basics for Copy Catalogers
Thomas posted:
Preferred name basis for authorized access point
Variant name basis for variant access point
Variant name basis for variant access point
Could this not be misunderstood to mean one may have more than one entry
for the same entity in a bibliographic record, despite your comment
Mac Elrod wrote:
Preferred name basis for authorized access point
Variant name basis for variant access point
Variant name basis for variant access point
Could this not be misunderstood to mean one may have more than one
entry
for the same entity in a bibliographic record, despite your
6 matches
Mail list logo
