Steve said:
I believe it is the difference between recording the name and recording
the preferred name. The General Guidelines on Recording Names (RDA 8.5)
makes it clear that it is talking about recording the name as it appears in the
item. On the other hand, RDA 8.6 talks of recording the
Apologies for cross-posting.
With the US government shutdown, it appears as if all sites with
.loc.gov (at least) have been shutdown as well. This would seem to mean
that if someone were using LC linked services id.loc.gov, anything will
fail.
Interruption with linked data services have
The following ALA and LC responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are
available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html):
6JSC/ACOC/8/LC response
6JSC/ALA/22/LC response
6JSC/ALA/23/LC response
6JSC/ALA/25/LC response
6JSC/ALA/26/LC response
6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1/LC
As I understand it, 8.4 is under general guidelines and is about recording
names. It doesn't say whether they are in a statement of responsibility or a
preferred name or access point or whatever.
RDA assumes that a library will have a preferred language and script based on
the needs of its
Please excuse cross postings
NOTSL will hold its Fall meeting on Friday, November 22, 2013. Our topic is
Linked Data and the Library.
Dr. Marcia Zeng, Professor of Library and Information Science at Kent State
University, will be our morning speaker. Dr. Zeng holds a Ph.D. from the
School
Quoting Mac. : Some tell me I need not worry about Bibframe I will be dead by
then; wish RDA
could have waited that long!
Can't imagine who'd be qualified to tell you that. For all we know, Bibframe
may be implemented in a few years, not for a long time, even not at all. We
know none of us
I spend a lot of time being grateful to all the generous people who share their
expertise here. In this case, I am so pleased that so many took the trouble to
comment on how they are handling GMD in real time.
Karen Nelson
Capilano University
I recently taught at RDA at the National Library of Israel. They do not
have a single preferred script, nor a single language of cataloging. In
fact they have four: Hebrew, Arabic, roman, and Cyrillic. Depending on
the script of the resource they are cataloging, they will use an
authorized
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Even Bibframe does not have WEMI
True, but that's BIBFRAME, not RDAFRAME or FRBRFRAME. BIBFRAME, as I've
come to understand it, is trying to be all things to all people.
Supposedly something called application profiles will serve as templates
that lay
Regarding the 6JSC/BL/13/LC response at
http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-BL-13-LC-response.pdf, please note a typo
in the first example on page 8:
Puymaigre, Th. de, (Theodore), comte
There should not be a comma after de.
I also continue to have concerns that the current text nor the
Mark said:
Presumably the RDA profile will incorporate the WEMI entities and all
the other whiz-bang components of that standard.
As I understand it, what are Expressions in RDA (e.g. translations)
are Works in Bibframe. The WEMI structure of RDA would be as
irrelevant to Bibframe as it is to
11 matches
Mail list logo
