With all these discussions and proposals about RDA being submitted, how
dynamic is RDA? Is it still a code in process of becoming?
How can we call it a cataloging code, when the code keeps changing, almost
daily?
--
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
That is the thing bothering me. I cited RDA rules in my training materials.
But once I go back, there are some changes. I cannot see when I can truly
end my work :)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu wrote:
With all these discussions and proposals about RDA being
) 491-2939
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:31 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] RDA--How dynamic
/ Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 1:15 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA--How dynamic is it?
It might be hard to remember since it ended some time ago, but AACR2 was under
Fairmount St.
Wichita, KS 67260-0068
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 1:15 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA--How dynamic
Kevin said:
It might be hard to remember since it ended some time ago, but AACR2 was un=
der continual revision after it was published.
There were, however, far fewer changes due to not being able to
understand what the text was saying.
It was not long ago for me, but midway through my
6 matches
Mail list logo
