>So, would we just ignore CIP information that would normally go in a
>transcription field?
In most cases, the CIP information is in the LC or LAC record which
was upgraded from a CIP one. We would not remove nor bracket that
information; it is in the item.
Of course one must be aware of earlie
On Saturday, April 13, 2013 9:50 PM, Jacqueline Byrd wrote:
>So, would we just ignore CIP information that would normally go in a
>transcription field? It's not unusual for me to find an edition and/or series
>statement only in the CIP. Is it best not to record information for these
>fields if
AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA & CIP
Dear Michael,
I believe this is the LC-PCC PS you are looking for (2.2.2.1):
LC practice/PCC practice: Do not consider pre-publication cataloging data
(foreign or domestic) appearing in the item as a source of inform
DA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA & CIP
You consider it so, and others consider it not so. But my question is
really what does RDA say about it, and if it is silent then do we need
an LC-PCC PS to address this question.
Isn't CIP data transfer supposed to be part of the automation in this
process, especially from a bibframe perspective?
Cindy Wolff
> Honestly, I never have thought about that CIP is a
reliable source. But
> maybe I am wrong. Since Ian mentioned
translation, I have a Chinese
> translation joke.
Honestly, I never have thought about that CIP is a reliable source. But
maybe I am wrong. Since Ian mentioned translation, I have a Chinese
translation joke. I have done several Chinese books for the Lincoln
Presidential Library. These books all are thread-bound. One of matched OCLC
records showed
RDA-L readers,
Sometimes CIP for a previous edition is printed. In such cases you can take
pertinent data, such as the LCCN (which is invalid, and should be coded so
using subfield z, but is nevertheless usable as a search key) and include it in
the record for the book in hand.
Once I had a
n
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:33 PM
> To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA & CIP
>
> Haha.
>
> My librarian nearly had a fit when she discovered that I, as a new
> cataloguing technician, was deriving edition statements from CIP info.
>
You consider it so, and others consider it not so. But my question is
really what does RDA say about it, and if it is silent then do we need
an LC-PCC PS to address this question.
On 4/11/2013 3:53 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
Subject: [RDA-L] RDA& CIP
Is CIP data printed in the book &
>Subject: [RDA-L] RDA & CIP
>Is CIP data printed in the book "part of the resource"?
We consider it so.
>Specifically, if the CIP includes an edition statement that does not
>appear anywhere else in the volume, should it be included in the
>bibliographic record?
ginal Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Karen Nelson
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:33 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA & CIP
Haha.
My librarian nearly had a fit
source Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Michael Cohen
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:41 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] RDA & CIP
Our previous local practice was to never consider CIP data prin
Our previous local practice was to never consider CIP data printed in
the book as part of the "other preliminaries" that were valid as a
prescribed source of information under AACR2 2.0B2.
RDA 2.2.2.1 says "Use as the preferred source of information a source
forming part of the resource itself
13 matches
Mail list logo
