Re: [RDA-L] Wording of RDA

2011-08-09 Thread Bernhard Eversberg

08.08.2011 16:38, J. McRee Elrod:

Since one of the conditions set by the US national libraries for
implementation of RDA was rewording in simple English, why are
constituent cataloguing committees still working on rule wording
revisions, revisions which are often not amplifications?


The community has an interest in, if not a right to, knowing
what's happening now and who's doing what to meet the
criteria set forth by the LC report. Esp. those criteria
talking about the RDA text and the intended MARC replacement.
Too early to ask? Well, how far are we away from early 2013, on
the timescale of library history. We are again reduced to waiting
for things that should have happened yesteryear.

B.Eversberg


Re: [RDA-L] Wording of RDA

2011-08-09 Thread Mark Ehlert
The RDA report* mentions re-writing (or as was mentioned at ALA,
re-wording) selected chapters of RDA.  According to Beacher Wiggins
at an ALA Annual meeting, there will be a couple RDA chapters that
will be chosen for this work initially.  The text itself of RDA will
change as part of this process, but not the outcome of the
instructions nor the arrangement of the rules--hence the re-wording
moniker.  For instance, RDA 3.4.5 is about recording pagination of
text, and if, say, Chapter 3 were chosen for the re-write, 3.4.5 will
still be the place you look for filling out the 300 $a.

On another note that Bernhard has raised up-thread, it's interesting
that all the deadlines the Test Coordinating Committee set for the
conditions for adoption are multiples of 3.  Makes me wonder if news
on progress will be issued every three months, rather than more
frequently which I too would prefer.

* Page 13 of 
http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf

-- 
Mark K. Ehlert                 Minitex
Coordinator                    University of Minnesota
Bibliographic  Technical      15 Andersen Library
  Services (BATS) Unit        222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805            Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439
http://www.minitex.umn.edu/


[RDA-L] Wording of RDA

2011-08-08 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Since one of the conditions set by the US national libraries for
implementation of RDA was rewording in simple English, why are
constituent cataloguing committees still working on rule wording
revisions, revisions which are often not amplifications?


   __   __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
  {__  |   / Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__