@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 9:14 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
Deborah cited RDA:
I did see that 2.7.4.2 contradicts 2.7.4.7, but I interpreted it the
other way around: that 2.7.4.7 should
Deborah Fritz made some sensible points, but ...
So, rather than trying to discover that (who made the DVD), perhaps we
should just invoke the CORE instruction and just give the date (which is the
only core Production Statement element) that we think the copy was made
(perhaps [2013?])
The dance
One of the lines has Montclaire; should be Montclair. I used to go there a
lot in my youth. Bloomfield and Montclair were huge football rivals.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Chris Fox posted:
ferocious beauty:
GENOME
Liz Lerman
Dance Exchange
Fox, Chris c...@byui.edu wrote:
I'm fine with going with just the date, if there's agreement that it isn't
published
I was going to comment on this point up-thread, but was waylaid till now.
Is the choreographer creating DVDs of the performance for whomever asks for
it? If so, this sounds
Or, to be safe, you could say [between 2008 and 2013]
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:30 PM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Chris Fox asked:
Do I infer date of production based on the performance date (2008),
or when I think the disc was actually created (2013)?
If you decide on 2013,
Please excuse cross-posting...
Hello,
I am trying to catalog a DVD which I *think* would be considered unpublished:
A professor here wrote to the choreographer of a performance he saw to find out
if it was possible to obtain a recording of the dance. He was told by the
choreographer that
Chris Fox asked:
If true, where and how in the MARC record do I record the production statem=
ent?
Use 264 0 $a$b$c, with the place, name of the dance company, and year,
each in its own two brackets.
Providing producer of unpublished material (264 0)is one of RDA's
very few good
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
Chris Fox asked:
If true, where and how in the MARC record do I record the production
statem= ent?
Use 264 0 $a$b$c, with the place, name of the dance company, and year, each
in its own two brackets.
Providing producer
and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:16 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
Chris,
If you decide that the DVD is, indeed, unpublished
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
On the producer's name, 2.7.4.2, sources of information, include the same
sources as the others:
Take producers' names from the following sources (in order of preference):
a) the same source as the title proper (see 2.3.2.2)
b) another source
] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 4:10 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
I did see that 2.7.4.2 contradicts 2.7.4.7, but I interpreted it the other way
around: that 2.7.4.7 should be adjusted, because we were not allowed
Chris Fox asked:
Do I infer date of production based on the performance date (2008),
or when I think the disc was actually created (2013)?
If you decide on 2013, don't forget 518 for performance date.
Might it be that the video recording was made of the 2008 performance,
and a copy made for
Deborah cited RDA:
I did see that 2.7.4.2 contradicts 2.7.4.7, but I interpreted it the other
way around: that 2.7.4.7 should be adjusted, because we were not allowed to
supply a publisher, etc. name under AACR; so I felt that RDA was continuing
that policy. However, I see that we *are* allowed
13 matches
Mail list logo
