Jonathan Rochkind said:
Won't it have an alternate 'access point' for the other nation(s)
too, and thus be findable at either alphabetical location regardless
of which nation comes first in the given translation?
One hopes. But main entry determines Cutter, thus place on the shelf;
as well as
Hal Cain answered Jonathan Rochind concerning why reference
librarians might care about entry:
Because main entry usually determines the call number within a
classification sequence?
The other half of the question was why they should care about
justification of added entries. I think a patron
www.cuyahogalibrary.org
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Patt Leonard
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 11:27 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] What do I tell
Adger asked what to tell the reference librarians:
1. GMD replaced by 33x.
Or fixed field based icons. You should tell them were to look; I hope
*not* between collation and series! ISBD having media terms in Area 0
suggests display above other date. I would display 338 and 336 in
that order,
Adger asked what to tell the reference librarians:
Mac said Treaties under first nation (or a single nation if with a group),
regardless of number.
That should be Treaty authorized access points (what we used to call
author/uniform title entreis) are established under first nation named in the
Won't it have an alternate 'access point' for the other nation(s) too,
and thus be findable at either alphabetical location regardless of which
nation comes first in the given translation?
On 6/2/2011 4:18 PM, Pat Sayre McCoy wrote:
Adger asked what to tell the reference librarians:
Mac said
-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 3:23 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] What do I tell the others?
Won't it have an alternate 'access point' for the other nation(s) too,
and thus be findable at either alphabetical location regardless
On 6/2/2011 4:54 PM, Arakawa, Steven wrote:
Do public service staff examine catalog records to verify that access points
have been justified? (Don't most brief records eliminate such notes?) Do they
care if author main entry is used instead of title main entry if there are more
than 3
Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 1:55 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] What do I tell the others?
[Text deleted]
Regarding capitalization--I looked
/ Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Patt Leonard
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 5:51 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] What do I tell the others?
The downside to capitalizing every word in a title is that it makes the entire
10 matches
Mail list logo
