Hi Artur, I don't know which solution is "right". It seems that we may not need owl-cpp library, since the IO can be handled with rdflib. Moreover there's a lack of support of different ontology formats (e.g. Turtle) in owl-cpp, so rdflib is more universal in this context. On the other hand, I'm not sure if the huge ontologies work well inside rdflib. At least from my experience they require explicit "sys.setrecursionlimit" call to be read properly. And since Fact++ is something about performance and capacity, I think, we need to be careful, not to turn rdflib in a bottleneck here. In this sense, I'd bet on owl-cpp and refuse of rdflib or may be follow your cffi idea.
I'll write you a personal email to discuss our aims. Best, Evgeny -- http://github.com/RDFLib --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rdflib-dev@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/0c9afc2f-bf15-422c-8e4c-7108443b7308%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
