Re: [rdiff-backup-users] [from] Re: Memory usage during regressions

2011-10-31 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 28/10/2011 11:03, john wrote: Hi The same problem as described here strucked me, too: When regressing a backup, rdiff-backup starts instantly consuming memory at quite a high rate, until it reaches 3GB. Then it dies with a memory allocation error, because it is running on

[rdiff-backup-users] excessive fsync(2)

2011-10-31 Thread Greg Troxel
With 1.2.8 on NetBSD, I was seeing insanely long backup times, as in over a week for a 300G filesystem on which little had changed. With ktrace, I found the problem was that fsync() was called incredibly often (per file checked?) and my backup drive was mounted with WAPBL (metadata journaling),

[rdiff-backup-users] 1.2.8 vs 1.3.3

2011-10-31 Thread Greg Troxel
On the web page, 1.2.8 is listed as stable and 1.3.3 as development/unstable. But, it's been a long time. So: are there changes since 1.3.3? if so, should there be a new release? is anyone who has project admin permission around? is 1.3.3 considered stable? As in, should I upgrade

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] 1.2.8 vs 1.3.3

2011-10-31 Thread D. Kriesel
Greg, it seems this mailing list has not seen any message of the currently responsible project leader for a long time. I agree in thinking that 1.3.3 is the best and most stable version so far, It has still bugs though. Cheers David. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: