Yeah I dunno what happened. I responded on my phone, anyway, I was committing
to getting back rdiff-backup.org
Dave
> From: "EricZolf"
> To: "Rdiff Backup"
> Sent: Monday, 5 August, 2019 1:45:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 migration
> and
>
Hi,
On 04/08/2019 08:59, Eric L. wrote:
> OK, I've created a sub-branch ericzolf-py2to3-bytes and will work on
> this aspect, moving away from str for paths to bytes.
If someone is interested, there is a working version at
https://github.com/ericzolf/rdiff-backup/tree/ericzolf-py2to3-bytes
You
On 04/08/2019 14:46, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I added the below --was it intended that there be some content in
> this message? If so, I don't see it.
>
> (The reason I bring this up is that, over on the Debian user list, someone
> was
> sort of constructing there own emails (iiuc), and
I added the below --was it intended that there be some content in
this message? If so, I don't see it.
(The reason I bring this up is that, over on the Debian user list, someone was
sort of constructing there own emails (iiuc), and unintentionally inserting a
null (0x00) in the content. My
___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
Am 02.08.19 um 12:09 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen:
> FYI: I've republished the gh-pages webpage under
> http://rdiff-backup.net/ since we dont' have access to
> rdiff-backup.org
Why don't we have access to rdiff-backup.org? Do we know the owner of
the domain registration of rdiff-backup.org? Whois and
Hi,
On 03/08/2019 14:50, Robert Nichols wrote:
>> The way to work around this in rdiffweb at least it's to manage path as
>> bytes. That is how rdiffweb 1.2.8 is working. Path are bytes. That is
>> also
>> how most filesystem are working too. Paths are bytes and those are
>> decoded
>> to be
