Re: Doubled dates in old repositories

2020-04-21 Thread Eric L. Zolf
Hi, On 21/04/2020 13:46, Dominic Raferd wrote: > Despite the failed verifications, I have successfully recovered a largish > (>150MB) file from December 2008 in the impacted repository. As there are > 2806 later versions of this file (with changes in this file occurring > between most of these

Re: Version Woes

2020-04-21 Thread Patrik Dufresne
Hello Brian, Following up with you. Did you get all the information you need to fix your initial problem ? Does the migration document contain all the information you need in order to fix your issue ? If not please let us know so we can update the documentation. On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 2:19

Re: Doubled dates in old repositories

2020-04-21 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 07:17, Eric Lavarde wrote: > > > On 20/04/2020 22:54, Gregor Zattler wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > * "Eric L. Zolf" [2020-04-20; 07:43]: > >> How to detect (under Linux): run `cd MY_BACKUP_REPO; ls -1 > >> rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.* | sed -e 's/^.*mirror_metadata\.//'

Re: Doubled dates in old repositories

2020-04-21 Thread Eric Lavarde
On 20/04/2020 22:54, Gregor Zattler wrote: > Hi Eric, > * "Eric L. Zolf" [2020-04-20; 07:43]: >> How to detect (under Linux): run `cd MY_BACKUP_REPO; ls -1 >> rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.* | sed -e 's/^.*mirror_metadata\.//' >> -e 's/\.[a-z]*.gz$//' | uniq -cd` -> if the output is NOT

Re: Doubled dates in old repositories

2020-04-21 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, I've created a fix for the issue at [328], in case someone is willing to test it on an impacted repo, or rather on a _copy_ of it. On 20/04/2020 22:04, Dominic Raferd wrote: >> How do you mean, it fails? A repository not touched since 2013 fails on >> --verify, or all your repositories fail