Hello,
I'm running a backup from rdiff-backup with 1.2.8 from Windows to Linux
with win_acls enabled. I have a backup running for more than 4 days and
usually it only takes a couple of minutes.
After much digging, I notice the only changes involved is a win_acls.
$ zgrep -A15
On 4/21/21 12:08 PM, Patrik Dufresne wrote:
[snip]
1. I'm not aware of any changes in the logic between 1.2.8 and 2.0.5
regarding Win_acls. So I'm expecting this to be an issue in 2.0.5. Is it ?
2. Would we consider this normal behavior to create increments (empty
increment) when the only
Hi Griffin,
On 22/04/2021 06:39, griffin tucker wrote:
is there a way to change the timestamps of the backups?
no
or perhaps replace the timestamps with a unique name?
no
would this cause a faulty restore or a damaged backup?
yes, rdiff-backup makes a lot of date/time comparaisons so
Hi,
On 22/04/2021 05:15, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 4/21/21 12:08 PM, Patrik Dufresne wrote:
[snip]
1. I'm not aware of any changes in the logic between 1.2.8 and 2.0.5
regarding Win_acls. So I'm expecting this to be an issue in 2.0.5. Is
it ?
2. Would we consider this normal behavior to
is there a way to change the timestamps of the backups?
or perhaps replace the timestamps with a unique name?
would this cause a faulty restore or a damaged backup?
