On 2021-06-01 10:32 a.m., Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
Alvin Starr wrote:
I thought rdiff-backup like rsync keeps track of the file metadata
like size and creation date to skip reading the data again if the
file has not been updated?
I assume rdiff-backup does the same thing to decide if a file
On 2021-06-01 10:20 a.m., Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
"Jonas Schoepf"
My drive is connected via USB.
I think we're on the right track. What version of USB?
Before using rdiff-backup I used just rsync, where the initial backup
took also quite long, but the following backups took ~20
Have you thought about using the Percona XtraBackup or one of its
derivatives?
It has the advantage of being able to take a live database backup
without having to lock everything for potentially a long time.
It also has the ability to do incremental backups.
The backup is stored as a
On 2023-01-03 13:49, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 1/3/23 11:44 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
I have one rdiff-backup installation for which "rdiff-backup
--version" reports "rdiff-backup 2.2.0" and another which reports
"rdiff-backup 2.2.2". The problem:
1. On both systems, "rpm -q
On 11/19/23 06:42, EricZolf wrote:
Hi,
I'm especially looking at Frank, but perhaps some SuSE packager is
here, or anybody else with specific needs.
As a long time Fedora and RH/Centos user I would hate to see
rdiff-backup disappear from the repositories.
I have seen packages drop the RPM
