Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2012-10-21 Thread Sai kee Wong
Thanks for the reply. Yes I did check the related pages. And I tried to use the Python version 2.6 which I assume should not suffer from the problem. But it does suffer. At that time, I was using Mac OS 10.6 which is assumed to be 64 bits. Until recently, test was done with Mac OS 10.8 with

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2012-10-20 Thread Joe Steele
It looks like you were encountering the python bug identified here: http://bugs.python.org/issue1747858 Before their fix, the uid was being converted to a (32 bit) signed int, which, as you have noted, isn't big enough. After the fix, the uid is converted to a long. I don't know anything

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2012-10-17 Thread Sai kee Wong
After the orignal post, there is no feedback. Recently, I tried to fix the problem. I didn't know any about Python, started debugging by inserting print statement. Figured out in the Mac, some times it has file with uid and gid set to 4294967294 (nobody). It seems Python doesn't accept

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2010-10-14 Thread Thomas fake Jakobi
hi, manual reply to this: http://www.mail-archive.com/rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org/msg04953.html But then there's http://bugs.python.org/issue6873, which indicates that perhaps lchown still has the problem in the released Python versions. If you can figure out how to reproduce it outside

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2010-01-20 Thread R. David Murray
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:11:56 +0100, Michel Le Cocq miconof80.l...@gmail.com wrote: File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rdiff_backup/rpath.py, line 973, in chown try: self.conn.C.lchown(self.path, uid, gid) OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum Michel Le Cocq

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2010-01-17 Thread Michel Le Cocq
I'm building a virtual machine like my save server. I tried rdiff-backup-devel-1.3.3 and rdiff-backup-1.2.8,1 on this virtual host and I've got the same error So I did : $ pkg_add gcc45 $ pkg_add -r librsync $ wget http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup-1.2.8.tar.gz $

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2010-01-17 Thread Adrian Klaver
On Sunday 17 January 2010 10:40:17 am Michel Le Cocq wrote: I'm building a virtual machine like my save server. I tried rdiff-backup-devel-1.3.3 and rdiff-backup-1.2.8,1 on this virtual host and I've got the same error So I did : $ pkg_add gcc45 $ pkg_add -r librsync $ wget

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2010-01-15 Thread Michel Le Cocq
Andrew Ferguson-4 wrote: On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: Backing up from the 64-bit system works fine, and two of the directories I'm backing up from the 32-bit system are fine as well. However, one directory reports OverflowError: signed integer is greater than

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2009-01-06 Thread Andrew Ferguson
On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: First of all, I really like rdiff-backup. In most cases (all but the one I'll detail below), it's been great for me. Searching in the mailing-list archives has led me to believe that either the operating system version (64- versus 32-bit) or