Great.
After this next round of travis builds passes I will merge the two
outstanding PRs and then do the release.
-greg
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Greg Landrum
> wrote:
> > Would you be comfortable with me doing the release base
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> Would you be comfortable with me doing the release based on the current
> state of the code (once that PR is merged, of course)?
Yes, I guess we're good to go.
As soon as we have the final tarball I will build RHEL 7 and Fedora
RPMs at the us
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Greg Landrum
> wrote:
> > The problem here is that the rdkit doesn't really support Python 2.6
> > anymore. I don't remember at the moment which pieces we used, but there
> are
> > 2.7+ bits in there
>
>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> The problem here is that the rdkit doesn't really support Python 2.6
> anymore. I don't remember at the moment which pieces we used, but there are
> 2.7+ bits in there
Then I guess the Software Collections approach mentioned by Riccardo
is b
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Riccardo Vianello
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Maybe the centos6 rpms could be build with a dependency from the software
> collections repository
> (https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL)? Gianluca, do
> you know if this could be a viable solution?
On Friday, 15 April 2016, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Greg Landrum > wrote:
> > Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python
> > 2.6
> > Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the
> > RDKit?
>
> No, there are
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> This PR: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/864
> has a version that builds a python wrapper for me on Centos6 with python2.7
> installed manually.
I'll check it out
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twi
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python
> 2.6
> Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the
> RDKit?
No, there are a few methods for getting 2.7 as RPMs, but the deafult
build stic
Hi all,
Maybe the centos6 rpms could be build with a dependency from the software
collections repository (
https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL)? Gianluca, do
you know if this could be a viable solution?
Best,
Riccardo
This PR: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/864
has a version that builds a python wrapper for me on Centos6 with python2.7
installed manually.
FWIW, I've attached the bootstrap.sh that I used to configure the vagrant
box (clearly still a work in progress: it doesn't bring in the requirements
for
Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python
2.6
Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the
RDKit?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> For the records, Build with RHEL/CentOS 7 succeded, this leaves us
> with only o
That'd be awesome.. thanks. :-)
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Brian Kelley wrote:
> The fix is buried here:
>
> https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/677/files
>
> It is in the BOOST_PYTHON_SUPPORT_SHARED_CONST
>
> The reason we didn't merge is was the problem with the exported defines,
> howev
The fix is buried here:
https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/677/files
It is in the BOOST_PYTHON_SUPPORT_SHARED_CONST
The reason we didn't merge is was the problem with the exported defines,
however I can tie it into the boost version in the FilterCatalog header
file. We had initially thought th
Under any circumstances: if we only support more recent versions we should
indicate that in the CMakeLists.txt, which claims to support back to boost
1.39 with python2 and 1.45 with python3.
I will take a look
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Brian Kelley wrote:
> I think I have seen this befo
I think I have seen this before in FilterCatalog, I can try to patch it for
boost 1.41 but I will say that version of boost is getting pretty long in the
tooth.
Brian Kelley
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 6:43 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
>
> I'd like to have it work on EL6; that's still pretty common
I'd like to have it work on EL6; that's still pretty common.
I will make some time to investigate either this evening or tomorrow.
Thanks for narrowing it down so much.
-greg
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> For the records, Build with RHEL/CentOS 7 succeded, this lea
For the records, Build with RHEL/CentOS 7 succeded, this leaves us
with only one platform where it fails; if we think the older boost
version cannot be supported, I can just stick to an older release for
EL6
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:37
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> Which version of boost are you using?
RPMs are built against the packages in the repositories (stock+updates).
Right now it means 1.41.0 for RHEL6, 1.53 for RHEL 7 (building now,
will let you know how it goes)
-
Gianluca,
Which version of boost are you using?
-greg
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> The RPM build for Fedora worked so I moved to RHEL/CentOS and got a new
> error:
>
>
> In file included from /usr/include/boost/python/to_python_indirect.hpp:10,
>
The RPM build for Fedora worked so I moved to RHEL/CentOS and got a new error:
In file included from /usr/include/boost/python/to_python_indirect.hpp:10,
from /usr/include/boost/python/converter/arg_to_python.hpp:10,
from /usr/include/boost/python/call.hpp:15,
20 matches
Mail list logo
